2012 Master’s thesis was a one stride up of its precedence by virtue of its urban concerns and representation. The intent has been varied significantly but everyone remained subservient to the methodology that frequelty has been emphasized. Thesis topic varied by intention on:
– TOPOGRAPHY & URBANISM
– MOVEMENT SYSTEM & URBANISM
– TRANSFORMATION OF SALT PAN
– MRT & URBANISM
– EVERYDAY URBANISM
– RITUALS & URBANISM
– INNER CITY TRANSFORMATION & URBANISM.
I think the diversity of varied intent created a matrix of multiplicity of contextual understanding. All the thesis are worthy of mention as issues are very relevant and at the same time morphing into an academic research forum. If practice assumes to be identification of technological tools for space engagement than academics is identification of questions on psychological, philosophical & phenomenal content of space engagement.
betweenarchitectureandurbanism.com 